Panama
Canal’s Role Part One
The Panama Canal
continued to play a central role in world trade and Panama's
economy in the mid-1980s. Some 5 percent of the world's
trade in goods passed through the canal, contributing 9
percent of Panamanian GDP in 1983. This canal's location at
one of the crossroads of international trade has spawned a
plethora of other service-oriented activities, such as
storage, ship repair, break bulk (the unloading of a portion
or all of a ship's cargo), transshipment, bunkering, and
distribution and services to ship travelers. The dynamism of
the canal also was instrumental in the development of the
CFZ, the trans-isthmian pipeline, and offshore financing.
Evidence suggests, however, that the canal's relative
importance to world trade is likely to continue to
experience a small relative decline in the future, which has
led Panama, together with the United States and Japan, to
study alternatives for improving or replacing the canal.
Role
of the Canal From 1903 to 1977
In 1903 the United States
secured the right, by treaty, to build a canal across
Panama. The United States rejected plans to build a
sea-level canal similar to that attempted by the French and
opted instead for a system based on locks. Construction
began in 1907 and was facilitated by medical work that
largely eradicated yellow fever and reduced the incidence of
malaria.
Construction of the canal
involved damming the Río Chagres to create the huge Gatun
Lake in the middle of the isthmus. Channels were dug from
each coast, and locks were built to raise and lower ships
between sea level and Gatun Lake. Three sets of locks were
constructed: Gatun Locks on the Atlantic side, and the Pedro
Miguel and Miraflores Locks on the Pacific side. The lock
chambers were 303 meters long by 33 meters wide, which
limited vessel size to approximately 287 meters in length
and 32 meters in width. Distance through the canal is
eighty-two kilometers, and in 1987 transit took about
fifteen hours, nearly half of which was spent in waiting.
The canal began commercial operations in 1914.
The United States
operated the canal and set tolls from the beginning of
operation. Tolls covered operation costs but were kept low
to encourage canal use. Direct benefits to Panama were
minimal, consisting of annual annuity payments that
increased infrequently, usually in response to Panamanian
demands. In the 1975 to 1977 period, the annuity payments
reached US$2.3 million a year. Indirect benefits to Panama's
economy were substantial, however, and included the jobs of
its citizens working in the Canal Zone, value of goods and
services sold to the Canal Zone and to passing ships, and
expenditures by visitors.
Economic
Implications of the 1977 Treaties
The 1977 treaties and the
related documents, which became effective October 1, 1979,
signaled important changes for the Panamanian economy. The
most obvious benefit was in receipts from operation of the
canal. Under the terms of the treaties, the government of
Panama receives from the Panama Canal Commission: a fixed
annuity of US$10 million; an annual payment of US$10 million
for public services such as police and fire protection,
garbage collection, and street maintenance, which Panama
provides in the canal operating areas and housing areas
covered by the treaties; a variable payment of US$0.30 per
Panama Canal net ton for each vessel transiting the canal
(in 1986 this amounted to US$57.6 million); and an
additional annuity, not to exceed US$10 million, to be paid
only when canal operations produce a profit. In 1986, for
example, US$1.1 million was paid; in 1984, on the other
hand, canal operations registered a US$4.1-million loss, and
no payment was made.
The United States
controls the tolls because of its majority (five members) on
the nine-member Panama Canal Commission, which will operate
the canal until December 31, 1999. In order to encourage use
of the canal, tolls have remained relatively low, although
high enough to cover costs. (Under the United States law
that implemented the canal treaties, the canal must be
operated on a self-sustaining basis.) Maximum use of the
canal is in Panama's interest, because its annuity depends
on transit tonnage. Tolls were raised by nearly 30 percent
in October 1979 and by an additional 9.8 percent in March
1983.
Under treaty provisions,
the canal administrator is an American and his deputy is a
Panamanian. In 1989, a Panamanian will become administrator
and the deputy an American. In order to prepare Panama to
assume operation of the canal in the year 2000, the Panama
Canal Commission has encouraged the hiring and training of
Panamanians for all types of canal-related work. The
commission's work force was approximately 82 percent
Panamanian in 1987.
According
to the treaty provisions, Panama also received substantial
assets in the former Canal Zone, including three large ports
(Colón, Cristóbal, and Balboa), the railroad across the
isthmus, two airfields, 147,700 hectares of land (including
housing, utility systems, and streets), a dry dock, large
maintenance and repair shops, and service facilities
formerly operated by the Panama Canal Company. Ownership and
operation of the canal ports of Balboa and Cristóbal were
transferred to Panama in October 1979, but a portion of
these port facilities will continue to be used by the Panama
Canal Commission for canal operations until the year 2000.
Panama also received housing that belonged to the former
Panama Canal Company, but will continue to supply housing to
the Panama Canal Commission and the United States Department
of Defense in decreasing amounts until 2000. Some assets and
functions of the government of the former Canal Zone, such
as schools and hospitals, are maintained by the United
States Department of Defense. The Panama Canal Commission
continues to operate utilities in the zone areas that it
received under the treaty.
|