The
Spanish Colony of Panama
Henry Morgan, a buccaneer
who had held Portobelo for ransom in 1668, returned to
Panama with a stronger force at the end of 1670. On January
29, 1671, Morgan appeared at Panama City. With 1,400 men he
defeated the garrison of 2,600 in pitched battle outside the
city, which he then looted. The officials and citizens fled,
some to the country and others to Peru, having loaded their
ships with the most important church and government funds
and treasure. Panama City was destroyed by fire, probably
from blown up powder stores, although the looters were
blamed. After 4 weeks, Morgan left with 175 mule loads of
loot and 600 prisoners. Two years later, a new city was
founded at the location of the present-day capital and was
heavily fortified.
The buccaneer scourge
rapidly declined after 1688 mainly because of changing
European alliances. By this time Spain was chronically
bankrupt; its population had fallen; and it suffered
internal government mismanagement and corruption.
Influenced by buccaneer
reports about the ease with which the isthmus could be
crossed--which suggested the possibility of digging a
canal--William Paterson, founder and ex-governor of the Bank
of England, organized a Scottish company to establish a
colony in the San Blas area. Paterson landed on the
Caribbean coast of the Darién late in 1698 with about 1,200
persons. Although well received by the Indians (as was
anyone not Spanish), the colonists were poorly prepared for
life in the tropics with its attendant diseases. Their
notion of trade goods--European clothing, wigs, and English
Bibles--was of little interest to the Indians. These
colonists gave up after six months, unknowingly passing at
sea reinforcements totaling another 1,600 people. The
Spanish reacted to these new arrivals by establishing a
blockade from the sea. The English capitulated and left in
April 1700, having lost many lives, mostly from malnutrition
and disease.
In Spain Bourbon kings
replaced the Hapsburgs in 1700, and some liberalization of
trade was introduced. These measures were too late for
Panama, however. Spain's desperate efforts to maintain its
colonial trade monopoly had been self-defeating. Cheaper
goods supplied by England, France, and the Netherlands were
welcomed by colonial officials and private traders alike.
Dealing in contraband increased to the detriment of official
trade. Fewer merchants came to the Portobelo feria
to pay Spain's inflated prices because the foreign suppliers
furnished cheaper goods at any port at which they could slip
by or bribe the coastal guards. The situation worsened; only
five of the previously annual fleets were dispatched to
Latin America between 1715 and 1736, a circumstance that
increased contraband operations.
Panama's temporary loss
of its independent audiencia, from 1718 to 1722,
and the country's attachment to the Viceroyalty of Peru were
probably engineered by powerful Peruvian merchants. They
resented the venality of Panamanian officials and their
ineffectiveness in suppressing the pirates (outlaws of no
flag, as distinct from the buccaneers of the seventeenth
century). Panama's weakness was further shown by its
inability to protect itself against an invasion by the
Miskito Indians of Nicaragua, who attacked from Laguna de
Chiriquí. Another Indian uprising in the valley of the Río
Tuira caused the whites to abandon the Darién.
The final blow to
Panama's shrinking control of the transit trade between
Latin America and Spain came before the mid- eighteenth
century. As a provision of the Treaty of Utrecht at the end
of the War of the Spanish Succession in 1713, Britain
secured the right to supply African slaves to the Spanish
colonies (4,800 a year for 30 years) and also to send 1 ship
a year to Portobelo. The slave trade provision evidently
satisfied both countries, but the trade in goods did not.
Smuggling by British ships continued, and a highly organized
contraband trade based in Jamaica--with the collusion of
Panamanian merchants--nearly wiped out the legal trade. By
1739 the importance of the isthmus to Spain had seriously
declined; Spain again suppressed Panama's autonomy by making
the region part of the Viceroyalty of New Granada
(encompassing present-day Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and
Panama).
In the same year, war
broke out between Britain and Spain. A British military
force took Portobelo and destroyed it. Panamanian historians
maintain that this attack diverted Spanish trade from the
trans-isthmian route. The Seville-Cádiz monopoly of
colonial trade had been breached by royal decrees earlier in
the century, and precedent was thus furnished for the
merchants of the Latin American colonies to agitate for
direct trade with Spain and for inter-colonial trade. After
1740 the Pacific coast ports were permitted to trade
directly via ships rounding Cape Horn, and the Portobelo feria
was never held again.
Relaxing the trading laws
benefited both Spanish America and Spain, but Panama's
economic decline was serious. Transit trade had for so long
furnished the profits on which Panama had flourished that
there had been no incentive to develop any other economic
base. After the suppression of its audiencia in
1751, Panama became a quiet backwater, a geographically
isolated appendage of New Granada, scarcely self-supporting
even in food and producing little for export.
In 1793, near the close
of the colonial period, the first recorded attempt at a
comprehensive census of the area that had comprised the
Panamanian audiencia was made. Incomplete and
doubtless omitting most of the Indian and cimarrón
populat- ion, specifically excluding soldiers and priests,
the census recorded 71,888 inhabitants, 7,857 of whom lived
in Panama City. Other principal towns had populations
ranging from 2,000 to a little over 5,000.
Social hierarchy in the
colony was rigid. The most prestigious and rewarding
positions were reserved for the peninsulares, those
actually born in Spain. Criollos, those of Spanish ancestry
but born in the colonies, occupied secondary posts in
government and trade. Mestizos, usually offspring of
Hispanic fathers and Indian mothers, engaged in farming,
retail trade, and the provision of services. African and
Indian slaves constituted an underclass. To the extent
possible, Indians who escaped enslavement avoided Hispanic
society altogether.
The church held a special
place in society. Priests accompanied every expedition and
were always counselors to the temporal leaders. The first
bishop on the mainland came with Pedrarias. The bishop's
authority, received from the king, made him in effect a vice
governor. The bishopric was moved from Darién to Panama
City in 1521. The relationship between church and government
in the colony was closer than in Spain. Both the Roman
Catholic Church and the monastic orders gained great wealth
through tithes and land acquisition.
|